Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRoger Owers
dc.contributor.authorSamuel T. Ariaratnam
dc.contributor.authorDaniel Armstrong
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:47Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:20:47Z
dc.date.copyrightApril 2007
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%282007%29133%3A2%28134%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47849
dc.description.abstractLawyerization has become more and more prevalent in the engineering and construction industry. Some would argue the merits of firms’ retaining lawyers on staff as providing cost savings on projects through averting potential litigation. Others view lawyers as increasing project costs due to increased overhead. Therefore, it is important to understand the pros and cons of lawyerization as viewed by the contractor, designer, owner, manufacturer, and supplier. This paper discusses the current role of lawyers in the engineering and construction industry and examines the factors that contribute to the lawyerization of the industry.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleLawyerization of the Engineering and Construction Industry
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume133
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2007)133:2(134)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2007:;Volume ( 133 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record