Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlexandros C. Kallantzis
dc.contributor.authorJohn D. Borcherding
dc.contributor.authorJames T. O’Connor
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:46Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:20:46Z
dc.date.copyrightJanuary 2007
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%282007%29133%3A1%2853%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47838
dc.description.abstractSubsurface ground conditions present a big factor of uncertainty in a construction project. It is difficult to determine subsurface ground conditions even with a prebid site investigation. Nevertheless, such conditions must be included in the bid price. Due to this uncertainty, claims arise during the construction of a project. Many claims end up in litigation. This paper presents an analysis of legal cases dealing with differing subsurface ground conditions in construction contracts. By creating a database containing salient features from legal cases related to subsurface ground conditions, this research identifies the most important factors influencing the outcome of legal cases pertaining to subsurface ground conditions. Further, the most commonly used arguments by the litigating parties and the precedent cases supporting them are identified and categorized.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleEvaluation of Differing Subsurface Ground Conditions in Construction Contracts
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume133
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2007)133:1(53)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2007:;Volume ( 133 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record