Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorP. Kennedy
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:42Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:20:42Z
dc.date.copyrightJuly 2006
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%282006%29132%3A3%28236%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47817
dc.description.abstractThis paper reports on a longitudinal study on the progress of statutory adjudication in the United Kingdom since its commencement in 1998. This study was carried out by the Adjudication Reporting Centre at Glasgow Caledonian University and it considers the statistical data provided by both Adjudicator Nominating Bodies and adjudicators themselves. Various trends are shown and reasons explored. These trends include the growth in adjudication referrals, numbers of adjudicators, causes of disputes, sums of money in dispute, seasonal trends, monitoring of adjudicators’ performance, procedures adopted, time limits, fees, etc. There is evidence that the disputes, while still predominantly about payment and valuation issues, are becoming larger and more complex. The impact of statutory adjudication on other forms of dispute resolution is considered.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleProgress of Statutory Adjudication as a Means of Resolving Disputes in Construction in the United Kingdom
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume132
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2006)132:3(236)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2006:;Volume ( 132 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record