• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Practitioner and Employer Assessment of ABET Outcome Criteria

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    %28asce%291052-3928%282005%29131%3A4%28231%29.pdf (101.9Kb)
    Date
    2005
    Author
    Enno “Ed” Koehn
    Mandaleeka S. Parthasarathy
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) has revised the accreditation criteria that are designed to assure that graduates of accredited programs are prepared to enter the practice of engineering and satisfy industrial requirements. The general criteria also specify that engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates possess or satisfy eleven (11) educational outcomes generally known as “a” through “k.” This investigation suggests that graduating seniors in civil engineering believe their educational experience has given them a strong background in two of the outcomes required by ABET. These include: (1) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering; and (2) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. In contrast, three outcomes received slightly lower ratings from alumni practitioners and employers. These include, a knowledge of contemporary issues; the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global/societal context; and an ability to communicate effectively. Overall, the data may suggest that not all ABET educational attributes are considered by graduating seniors in civil engineering, employers, and industrial practitioners, to have the same level of significance and perhaps should not be stressed to the same degree in an engineering program. In this regard, it was found that the scores from a benchmarking study tend to be lower than those of students and practitioners educated at Lamar University Nevertheless, for comparative purposes, the findings of the investigation could be utilized by other institutions and departments that may wish to study and/or assess their curriculum and satisfy ABET criteria.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47766
    Collections
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV