Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBryan M. Seifert
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:37Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:20:37Z
dc.date.copyrightApril 2005
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%282005%29131%3A2%28149%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47748
dc.description.abstractThe role of institutional arbitration has become significantly less commercially viable in the international construction industry as a primary means of dispute resolution because of the uniqueness of the construction process. As a result, the construction industry has developed an innovative form of primary dispute adjudication called the Dispute Adjudication Board (DAB). This paper will show the need for an efficient dispute resolution process because of the globalization of the construction industry. It will focus on the standard contract forms of the Féderation Internationale des Ingénieures-Conseils (International Federation of Consulting Engineers) (FIDIC), which are widely used in international construction projects. The paper will then discuss recent developments in the FIDIC, including the development of the DAB to address the fundamental need for a commercially viable means of construction dispute adjudication.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleInternational Construction Dispute Adjudication under International Federation of Consulting Engineers Conditions of Contract and the Dispute Adjudication Board
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume131
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2005)131:2(149)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2005:;Volume ( 131 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record