Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJeffrey S. Russell
dc.contributor.authorW. B. Stouffer
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:37Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:20:37Z
dc.date.copyrightApril 2005
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%282005%29131%3A2%28118%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47745
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents the results of a comprehensive survey of over 40% of the nation’s undergraduate civil engineering programs. This analysis is based on uniform data collected for accreditation and is principally concerned with three major groups of courses: (1) math and science, (2) general education, and (3) engineering topics. The analysis reveals what is currently being taught in our nation’s civil engineering undergraduate programs, what is not being taught, and the implications for future professional practice. The paper discusses how the average national curriculum has changed historically, how well the curriculum satisfies Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology criteria, and what the current distribution of courses and topics says about the priorities of civil engineering education. Overall, the curriculum was found to be highly specialized in terms of technical subjects but lacking in focus regarding the liberal arts, professional skills, and systems thinking.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleSurvey of the National Civil Engineering Curriculum
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume131
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2005)131:2(118)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2005:;Volume ( 131 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record