Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJoe Horlen
dc.contributor.authorNeil Eldin
dc.contributor.authorYashambari Ajinkya
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:37Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:20:37Z
dc.date.copyrightJanuary 2005
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%282005%29131%3A1%2876%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47740
dc.description.abstractAlthough reverse auctions have been utilized in the procurement of goods for many years, the availability and widespread use of the Internet has recently lead to a dramatic increase in its employment. Reverse auctions have recently found their way to a new market: procurement of construction services. As business and commerce have moved toward e-business and e-commerce, construction is drawn into such new practices. There is an ongoing debate as to whether reverse auctions are suitable equally for the procurement of both goods and services. Some contractors are concerned that reverse auctions are just another form of bid shopping. It is necessary for the construction industry to understand and evaluate the pros and cons of reverse auctions. This article discusses the procedures involved in conducting online reverse auctions and describes reverse auction practices, their advantages, and disadvantages. It also examines the legal principles of reverse auctions, potential problems, and challenges to its use.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleReverse Auctions: Controversial Bidding Practice
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume131
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2005)131:1(76)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2005:;Volume ( 131 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record