Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlbert Tiberi
dc.contributor.authorHazel Beh
dc.contributor.authorAmarjit Singh
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:36Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:20:36Z
dc.date.copyrightOctober 2004
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%282004%29130%3A4%28311%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47722
dc.description.abstractMechanic’s and materialman’s liens are an important alternative remedy for tradesmen who have not been paid for improvements made under a contract. These statutes allow the unpaid tradesman to place a lien on the improved property and then foreclose and force the sale of the property to satisfy the lien. While the procedures are technical and vary from state to state, general concepts are commonly shared. This article examines Hawaii’s mechanic’s lien statutes and case law and describes the basic procedures and requirements of the remedy for nonpayment on contracted work. Because a lien jeopardizes an owner’s interest in his real property, courts require strict compliance with procedural safeguards including notice and a right to a hearing to contest the lien before the property can be foreclosed. Owners can avoid the danger of liens by requiring payment bonds, by ensuring that subcontractors and suppliers are promptly paid, and by overseeing the project with care. The issues surrounding timely filing are emphasized.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleMechanic’s Liens on Private Projects in Hawaii
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume130
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2004)130:4(311)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record