Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaye L. Brubaker
dc.contributor.authorRichard H. McCuen
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:24Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:19:24Z
dc.date.copyrightOctober 1990
dc.date.issued1990
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%281990%29116%3A4%28375%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47035
dc.description.abstractIn many statistical analyses for the development of engineering design models, the use of a 5% level of significance is based on tradition. Stepwise regression analysis, using the 5% level of significance, is applied to measured data from engineering systems. The results demonstrate that the commonly used 5% criterion can lead to an incorrect model under certain conditions. Specifically, models with either irrational or inaccurate regression coefficients or too many predictor variables may result. The application of the 5% criterion in stepwise regression analysis is critically assessed, and the conditions under which problems occur are identifled. An alternative decision approach, based on an analysis of the partial
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleLevel of Significance Selection in Engineering Analysis
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume116
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1990)116:4(375)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1990:;Volume ( 116 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record