| dc.contributor.author | Kaye L. Brubaker | |
| dc.contributor.author | Richard H. McCuen | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:19:24Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-05-08T21:19:24Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | October 1990 | |
| dc.date.issued | 1990 | |
| dc.identifier.other | %28asce%291052-3928%281990%29116%3A4%28375%29.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47035 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In many statistical analyses for the development of engineering design models, the use of a 5% level of significance is based on tradition. Stepwise regression analysis, using the 5% level of significance, is applied to measured data from engineering systems. The results demonstrate that the commonly used 5% criterion can lead to an incorrect model under certain conditions. Specifically, models with either irrational or inaccurate regression coefficients or too many predictor variables may result. The application of the 5% criterion in stepwise regression analysis is critically assessed, and the conditions under which problems occur are identifled. An alternative decision approach, based on an analysis of the partial | |
| dc.publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| dc.title | Level of Significance Selection in Engineering Analysis | |
| dc.type | Journal Paper | |
| dc.journal.volume | 116 | |
| dc.journal.issue | 4 | |
| dc.journal.title | Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1990)116:4(375) | |
| dc.tree | Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1990:;Volume ( 116 ):;issue: 004 | |
| dc.contenttype | Fulltext | |