Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorT. E. Fenske
dc.contributor.authorS. M. Fenske
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:24Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:19:24Z
dc.date.copyrightOctober 1990
dc.date.issued1990
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%281990%29116%3A4%28345%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47032
dc.description.abstractA profession is defined as “an occupation or vocation requiring advanced study in a specialized field.” The urgent question facing the engineering profession today is how much longer we can continue to lay claim to being “professionals” given the increasingly complex natures of technology and our society and the lack of adequate curriculum adjustment to meet the demands of this changing environment. Within the past 20, even 10, years, our world has changed drastically. All of these technological advances have mandated inclusion in the engineering curriculum of related coursework. However, much of this additional coursework has been added in the postbaccalaureate curriculum, and the addition of this technical material, which has been accomplished in the undergraduate curriculum, generally has been implemented at the expense of the “nontechnical” courses in the curriculum. This paper presents ideas regarding the expansion of the basic engineering curriculum and the courses necessary to provide a complete education for professional engineers.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleNeed for “Professional” Education for Professional Engineers
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume116
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1990)116:4(345)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1990:;Volume ( 116 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record