Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGeorge Stukhart
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:19Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:19:19Z
dc.date.copyrightOctober 1989
dc.date.issued1989
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%281989%29115%3A4%28398%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46962
dc.description.abstractContinuing‐education programs provide a vital service to the engineering profession and are an important university function. They serve to keep engineers current on technology and to educate them in skills needed for managing enterprises. They are an excellent example of university‐industry cooperation, and universities can obtain considerable benefit from making possible such transfers of knowledge. Nevertheless, the role of continuing education for professional engineers is not in the mainstream of many universities. This role is frequently performed by in‐house company programs or consultants. A notable exception is the Texas A&M University Construction Executive Program, which has become nationally recognized for its contribution to the construction industry. Using this program as an example, the role of the university in continuing education is assessed.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleContinuing Education for Engineers: University's Role
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume115
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1989)115:4(398)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1989:;Volume ( 115 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record