Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLuh‐Maan Chang
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:18Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:19:18Z
dc.date.copyrightJuly 1989
dc.date.issued1989
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%281989%29115%3A3%28305%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46944
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a method which can be used for research on controversial issues such as awarding contracts to disadvantaged business enterprises (DBEs). In the research method both groups were surveyed to determine the opinions in various subjects. Chi‐square tests with contingency tables and Z tests were employed to distinguish the difference between the opposite groups so that a base could be established for policymakers to facilitate their search of further causes and specific workable plans. Both DBEs and non‐DBEs argued that they are confronted with difficulties in the areas of financing, bonding, labor, management skills, cheap competition, marketing, and debt collection. However, significant differences could be found between DBE contractors and non‐DBE contractors in the difficulties encountered by using the method discussed in this paper. The degree of differences can also be determined and quantified.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleMethod to Deal with DBE Issues
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume115
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1989)115:3(305)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1989:;Volume ( 115 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record