Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJon C. Liebman
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:17Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:19:17Z
dc.date.copyrightJuly 1989
dc.date.issued1989
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%281989%29115%3A3%28261%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46938
dc.description.abstractThe modern engineering curriculum has evolved to be heavily weighted with science and analysis. Recent concern with the need for instruction in design has led to the introduction of capstone design courses. These courses give the student an opportunity to produce a design, using the scientific principles and analytic methods learned previously. However, students are often thrown into such a course with little preliminary instruction on design methods. Though much of our early understanding of design consisted of broad generalities combined with sets of unrelated, uncodified tips and pointers, there is now a growing body of rigorous knowledge, first suggested 20 years ago, that might be called the science of design. This material is primarily related to techniques for generating, evaluating, and selecting among alternatives. Development of this science must be continued, but its incorporation into the curriculum should not wait for its perfection. Many of its components can and should be taught now, preparing students to undertake capstone design courses.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleDesigning the Design Engineer
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume115
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1989)115:3(261)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1989:;Volume ( 115 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record