First, Second, and Third Thoughts on Civil Engineering Education

dc.contributor.author	Emmett M. Laursen
dc.date.accessioned	2017-05-08T21:19:15Z
dc.date.available	2017-05-08T21:19:15Z
dc.date.copyright	April 1989
dc.date.issued	1989
dc.identifier.other	%28asce%291052-3928%281989%29115%3A2%28129%29.pdf
dc.identifier.uri	http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46922
dc.description.abstract	The civil engineering education of 50 years ago was excellent for its time. Changes since that time were good when they were evolutionary in response to needs and knowledge, not so good when they were forced for various reasons. The undergraduate curriculum needs to be reassessed in light of true conditions and needs, and programs for professional continuing education open to all and readily available need to be established or strengthened. Correspondence courses especially are needed. Graduate programs would change if professional programs flourished.
dc.publisher	American Society of Civil Engineers
dc.title	First, Second, and Third Thoughts on Civil Engineering Education
dc.type	Journal Paper
dc.journal.volume	115
dc.journal.issue	2
dc.journal.title	Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi	10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1989)115:2(129)
dc.tree	Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1989:;Volume ( 115 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttype	Fulltext