Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArthur A. DeFraites, Jr.
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:15Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:19:15Z
dc.date.copyrightApril 1989
dc.date.issued1989
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%281989%29115%3A2%28125%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46921
dc.description.abstractMr. DeFraites, a former COFPAES Chairman, discusses the quality of the design product as it relates to an owner's professional selection and procurement procedure. Project quality, the level of professional services to be provided, and fee are all related to the procurement process. Bidding establishes an adversarial relationship between the owner and the design professional; it is expensive and time‐consuming. The innovative ability of the design professional is not evaluated in a bidding process. The qualification‐based selection process results in a compatible owner/design professional team truly representing the best interest of the owner. “Price‐as‐a‐factor” procurement procedures have all of the disadvantages of straight bidding plus considerable additional cost to the design professionals involved.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleFee versus Quality
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume115
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1989)115:2(125)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1989:;Volume ( 115 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record