Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChris Holland
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:09Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:19:09Z
dc.date.copyrightOctober 1988
dc.date.issued1988
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%281988%29114%3A4%28424%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46864
dc.description.abstractIt is contended that there is no need for a general strategy towards transport infrastructure, since expenditure on infrastructure is simply a subset of expenditure in the transport system as a whole. Transport policy is considered as a governmental or societal response to technology and consumer preference, applying to the whole transport system. Aspects of policy relating to the control and management of various transport modes are discussed, first for the United Kingdom and then for the later developing countries. A distinction is drawn between regulatory policy, which is seen as fundamental, and policy arising from public ownership, which is seen as accidental. In the light of the discussion on policy, civil engineers are judged to have no unique role in decisions on policy. There is discussion of the important contribution that civil engineers can nonetheless make arising from their orientation towards practical achievement. Ways and means of increasing the influence of civil engineers are discussed, inter alia by increasing the number of women in the profession.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titlePlanning and Financing Transport—Where Civil Engineers Fit in
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume114
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1988)114:4(424)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1988:;Volume ( 114 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record