Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMurray A. Muspratt
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:04Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:19:04Z
dc.date.copyrightJanuary 1988
dc.date.issued1988
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%281988%29114%3A1%2885%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46817
dc.description.abstractResearch has been the basic academic prerogative for decades now. It has ensured that course material taught by professors was up‐to‐date, and it has provided a pool of ideas that industry needed to renew its competitiveness. However, the pivotal status of research in universities may now be eroded by innovations such as joint industry‐government‐university laboratories, by industry committees for monitoring academic courses, and by an apparent decline in incentives and rewards for academic research. Clear‐cut arguments can be made for pre‐proprietary research to remain the exclusive preserve of academia. However, academics must provide the leadership in such research and not wait for more advanced developments to filter back from industry. And furthermore, tenure for academics can only be justified if they are performing cutting‐edge research that challenges the status quo.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleThe Status of Research
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume114
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1988)114:1(85)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1988:;Volume ( 114 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record