Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRon D. Grovar
dc.contributor.authorEdward J. Rhomberg
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:01Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:19:01Z
dc.date.copyrightJuly 1987
dc.date.issued1987
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%281987%29113%3A3%28257%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46774
dc.description.abstractEngineers in the federal government are provided with one of two types of immunity (absolute or qualified) from liability litigation, if certain conditions are met. These conditions were not derived from statutes but developed in the courts over the years. To receive absolute immunity an official must act within the scope of his or her duties and perform a discretionary function. Qualified immunity is provided in cases involving violations of constitutional rights, and if officials can demonstrate the following: (1). They acted in good faith; (2) their conduct was valid; and (3) they acted in the framework of their duties. To show how the courts developed, interpreted, and applied these requirements, such as discretionary functions, several court cases are reviewed. Many of the cases involve public works and construction operations on military installations for the benefit of military engineers, public works officials, and construction administrators. However, the same requirements and immunities apply to all government officials with few exceptions, i.e., judges.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleLiability of Engineers in Federal Government
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume113
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1987)113:3(257)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1987:;Volume ( 113 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record