Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJoseph M. Petulla
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:00Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:19:00Z
dc.date.copyrightApril 1987
dc.date.issued1987
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%281987%29113%3A2%28167%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46754
dc.description.abstractA 4‐yr study of environmental management practices in industry reflected three approaches: (1) Crisis management, where the law is kept minimally, regulations are often resisted, and little is done until a crisis develops; (2) cost‐oriented management, where regulations are carried out as cheaply as possible, with mostly short‐term considerations taken into account; and (3) enlightened management, which looks to the long‐term good of the firm and to the spirit, as well as letter, of the law, so that long‐term environmental safety and corporate profits are maximized. A follow‐up check of 32 firms revealed that about 1/4 of the firms had improved the quality of their environmental management practices.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleEnvironmental Management in Industry
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume113
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1987)113:2(167)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1987:;Volume ( 113 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record