Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGreig Harvey
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:18:59Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:18:59Z
dc.date.copyrightJanuary 1987
dc.date.issued1987
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%281987%29113%3A1%2846%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46744
dc.description.abstractCivil engineering departments in American universities show considerable uncertainty about the role of planning in an engineering context. Fiscal pressures and changes in practice have eroded support for planning as an integral part of the civil engineering curriculum. Yet, current problems in the field, such as groundwater contamination and infrastructure decay, have institutional and organizational components that could be brought into civil engineering by planning faculty. This paper argues that civil engineering should integrate organizational and institutional knowledge into its academic core, rather than assume that on‐the‐job experience and other disciplines can be relied upon to illuminate the nontechnical aspects of infrastructure problems.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleOrganizational and Institutional Knowledge in Civil Engineering
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume113
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1987)113:1(46)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1987:;Volume ( 113 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record