Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEdward P. Becker
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:18:56Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:18:56Z
dc.date.copyrightApril 1986
dc.date.issued1986
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%281986%29112%3A2%28134%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46706
dc.description.abstractAt the October 1985 Board of Direction meeting in Detroit the report prepared by the ASCE Task Committee on Design Responsibility was adopted as official ASCE policy. The report recommended that (1) The Engineer of Record (EOR) should be responsible for the integrity of the structural design; and (2) the EOR should either design the connections or review and approve (for structural adequacy) the connections selected by the fabricator. Changes in technology and society as a whole which started in the 1960's had an adverse effect on the past practices for steel construction. This topic is of national interest because of an increase in structural failures in recent years and a trend toward assigning some of the design responsibility to the fabricator. Judge Deutsch's ruling concerning the role of the EOR and the fabricator on the Hyatt skywalk collapse further intensified interest in this subject. Hopefully, the recommendations presented in the ASCE report will reverse the practice of divided responsibility for the design of steel structures and provide guidance for the steel construction industry.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleWho Should Be Responsible for Structural Steel Design?
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume112
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1986)112:2(134)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1986:;Volume ( 112 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record