Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarvey A. Kagan
dc.contributor.authorJames Van de Water
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:18:56Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:18:56Z
dc.date.copyrightJanuary 1986
dc.date.issued1986
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%281986%29112%3A1%2858%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46703
dc.description.abstractThe rise in the number of lawsuits against engineers and architects has become a major concern to the design profession. Engineers and architects face lawsuits not only from their clients, but from contractors, construction workers and users of their designs. This article traces the evolution of this situation through a review of significant legal decisions. Until the 1950s designers were generally protected from lawsuits from third parties by the privity doctrine, and there was no need for professional liability insurance. Courts have since allowed greater latitude to the parties who can bring lawsuits against designers. The result has been a skyrocketing increase in the cost of professional liability insurance, making the coverage too costly for many small firms. Even more serious is the discouragement to creativity in design that this has caused. This is a serious problem that can only be solved by the active cooperation of the engineering, architecture and legal professions.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleDesign in Jeopardy: The Expanding Legal Responsibilities of Engineers
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume112
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1986)112:1(58)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1986:;Volume ( 112 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record