Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKathleen A. Vild
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:18:51Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:18:51Z
dc.date.copyrightJanuary 1984
dc.date.issued1984
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%281984%29110%3A1%2825%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46658
dc.description.abstractThe limitations of the current four‐year engineering curricula are examined, emphasizing the lack of liberal arts supplement to an undergraduate engineering education. While the importance of the engineering function in society is stressed, the increasing need for more policy conscious engineers is cited. In summary, it is suggested that the engineering degree be made a professional degree to be earned in graduate school after a liberal arts undergraduate education.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleThe Civil Engineering Degree: Education or Training?
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume110
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1984)110:1(25)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1984:;Volume ( 110 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record