Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorH. William Batt
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:18:50Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:18:50Z
dc.date.copyrightJanuary 1984
dc.date.issued1984
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%281984%29110%3A1%281%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46656
dc.description.abstractAs attention to the nation's infrastructure becomes a matter for political discussion, there is also a focus on the word itself. The funding formula will depend upon definition, and a review of the etymology is in order. The word is traceable to NATO war mobilization studies in the 1950's and to the economic development literature of low income nations shortly thereafter. Gradually it came to be used for capital investment of all sorts—human capital as well as physical plant investment. With so diffuse a meaning, the term tended to drop into disuse. Now in the 1980's we see a revival in the use of the term, with a likely repeat of its evolution as discussion develops over resource allocation to such legitimate claimants as transportation facilities, flood control, water and sewer facilities, health, education, and other public sector responsibilities.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleInfrastructure: Etymology and Import
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume110
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1984)110:1(1)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1984:;Volume ( 110 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record