Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBruce M. Thomson
dc.contributor.authorTimothy J. De Young
dc.contributor.authorConstance J. Meadowcroft
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:18:49Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:18:49Z
dc.date.copyrightJuly 1983
dc.date.issued1983
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%281983%29109%3A3%28214%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46643
dc.description.abstractEngineers often are key participants in required public participation processes. A case in point is the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement which usually involves engineers as representatives of governmental agencies or as professional consultants. A less common but equally important role for the engineer is as a member of an advisory committee or as a voluntary participant in public hearings. A case study of a recently completed EIS process involving the expansion of Albuquerque, New Mexico's wastewater collection and treatment facilities suggests a number of ways that engineers in each of these roles might improve their effectiveness. Increased voluntary participation by citizen engineers is recommended as an effective means to improve the public participation process as well as to enhance the reputation of the engineering profession.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleEngineer Roles in Public Participation Process
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume109
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1983)109:3(214)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1983:;Volume ( 109 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record