Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRobert D. Sokolove
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:18:49Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:18:49Z
dc.date.copyrightJuly 1983
dc.date.issued1983
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%281983%29109%3A3%28195%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46640
dc.description.abstractOver the years, the Federal Government through the National Flood Insurance Program has attempted to address the issue of flood plain management. Questioning the extent to which the enforcement of Federal regulations has reduced flood losses, the Government has begun to institute legal actions called subrogation in an attempt to recover insurance proceeds paid and better encourage sound flood plain management. The legal actions brought thus far, already totaling over $120 million, allege that various communities, builders, developers, engineers and architects, by their actions or inactions, have caused or contributed to various drainage and flooding conditions for which the National Flood Insurance Program has been called to reimburse the losses of flood victims. Engineers, particularly those who work with developers, builders, or those who design flood control projects should be aware of the subrogation action and the basis upon which, they too, could face legal liability.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleSubrogation: Enforcing Flood Plain Management
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume109
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1983)109:3(195)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1983:;Volume ( 109 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record