Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNeil S. Grigg
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:18:48Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:18:48Z
dc.date.copyrightApril 1983
dc.date.issued1983
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%281983%29109%3A2%2871%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46634
dc.description.abstractResponsibility for administration of environmental programs will fall heavily on state governments in the years ahead. In state environmental agencies there are some who advocate “programmatic” organizations and some who advocate “functional” organizations and some who advocate “functional” organizations. Experiences with both types in North Carolina's Division of Environmental Management are reviewed. The “programmatic” organization has worked best. There are implications for the practical feasibility of integrating environmental management. Lessons learned include: the dependence of organizational effectiveness on leadership; the hidden costs of reorganization; the importance of bureaucratic and political realities; the uniqueness of situations; and the general importance of the subject to the effectiveness of state government.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleIs Integrated Environmental Management Feasible?
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume109
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1983)109:2(71)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1983:;Volume ( 109 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record