Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJoseph S. Ward
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:18:47Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:18:47Z
dc.date.copyrightApril 1983
dc.date.issued1983
dc.identifier.other%28asce%291052-3928%281983%29109%3A2%28136%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/46627
dc.description.abstractMany problems face engineering education today. Among them are the four‐year program, faculty, and the preparation of graduates for the practice of engineering. Proposed solutions have been addressed in the recent report of the ASCE Task Committee on Education and the subsequent implementation of the goals and action plans. One solution to the current dilemma is the proposal for a professional school of engineering, an autonomous body within the university, dedicated to producing a graduate who is properly prepared to enter the practice of engineering. The cost for realizing such a program would be a partnership of the educational institution, government, and industry.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleProfessional Schools: the Debate Continues
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume109
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1983)109:2(136)
dc.treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1983:;Volume ( 109 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record