Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDaniel M. White
dc.contributor.authorIngegerd Ask
dc.contributor.authorChristina Behr-Andres
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:14:05Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:14:05Z
dc.date.copyrightMarch 2002
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.other%28asce%290887-381x%282002%2916%3A1%2817%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/43721
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this project was to test dispersant effectiveness in the laboratory under conditions relevant to Prince William Sound (PWS), Alaska. Two laboratory testing methods were used to compare a range of test conditions and dispersant to oil ratios (DORs) using PWS seawater at 8°C, Alaska North Slope (ANS) crude oil, and Corexit 9500. Three DORs were tested, 1:10, 1:20, and 1:50. It was found that in most cases, the dispersant effectiveness was directly proportional to the DOR. For each DOR, dispersant effectiveness was measured at four contact times (time between dispersant application to a spill and start of mixing) and five weathering times (time between oil spill and dispersant application). Corexit 9500 dispersed ANS crude oil at 8°C in PWS seawater to differing degrees, depending on the test conditions. The results indicated that, in general, the greatest dispersion occurred when the weathering time was minimized and a short contact time was provided.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleLaboratory Study on Dispersant Effectiveness in Alaskan Seawater
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume16
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Cold Regions Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)0887-381X(2002)16:1(17)
dc.treeJournal of Cold Regions Engineering:;2002:;Volume ( 016 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record