Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMark A. Tumeo
dc.contributor.authorDavid A. Guinn
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:13:55Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:13:55Z
dc.date.copyrightSeptember 1997
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifier.other%28asce%290887-381x%281997%2911%3A3%28221%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/43642
dc.description.abstractBiological treatment has become increasingly popular as a remediation method for soils and ground water contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbon, chlorinated solvents, and pesticides. Bioremediation has been considered for application in cold regions such as Arctic and subarctic climates and Antarctica. Studies to date suggest that indigenous microbes suitable for bioremediation exist in soils in these regions. This paper reports on two case studies, one in Antarctica and one in the subarctic, in which indigenous bacteria were found that were capable of mineralizing petroleum hydrocarbons in soil contaminated with jet fuel and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in Antarctica and pentachlorophenol (PCP) and diesel in contaminated soil in the subarctic southwestern Alaska. However, in both instances, ex-situ bioremediation was recommended for treatment of the contaminated soil because ex-situ treatment allows greater control over soil temperature, a limiting factor in cold climates.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleEvaluation of Bioremediation in Cold Regions
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume11
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Cold Regions Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)0887-381X(1997)11:3(221)
dc.treeJournal of Cold Regions Engineering:;1997:;Volume ( 011 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record