Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPeter M. Steurer
dc.contributor.authorJay H. Crandell
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:13:50Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:13:50Z
dc.date.copyrightJune 1995
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier.other%28asce%290887-381x%281995%299%3A2%2864%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/43591
dc.description.abstractA climatography of 100-year return-period air-freezing indexes (AFIs) has been developed to accompany recommendations for the design of frost-protected shallow foundations (FPSFs) in the U.S. residential construction industry. These design recommendations are based on European FPSF procedures and proposed consensus standards, so this paper investigates and compares the different methods of generating freezing indexes in Norway, Finland, and the United States. Previously overlooked, the differences in these methods have a substantial influence on the estimated AFI and the application of return-period statistics. The method used in the United States to calculate the AFI better represents the ground-freezing effect for all climate regimes. Additional research related to this topic has also shown that the Weibull distribution provides superior predictions of the AFI at long return periods.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleComparison of Methods Used to Create Estimate of Air-Freezing Index
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume9
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Cold Regions Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)0887-381X(1995)9:2(64)
dc.treeJournal of Cold Regions Engineering:;1995:;Volume ( 009 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record