Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJ. F. (Derick) Nixon
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T21:13:46Z
dc.date.available2017-05-08T21:13:46Z
dc.date.copyrightMarch 1991
dc.date.issued1991
dc.identifier.other%28asce%290887-381x%281991%295%3A1%2828%29.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/43535
dc.description.abstractThis paper reviews permafrost conditions from the deeper water conditions offshore through the shallower water near‐shore area to the onshore colder permafrost conditions. Depending on the initial depth to the permafrost surface, some deepening of the thaw line beneath the pipe will result from operating the pipeline at temperatures much above the permafrost melting point. Some preliminary geothermal predictions indicate incremental thaw depths of 0–10 m because of pipe operation, depending on the initial depth to the permafrost table. Uniform thaw subsidence poses less of a concern than differential settlement, which might induce curvatures and strains in the buried line. Differential thaw subsidence resulting from thawing of a buried permafrost zone was modeled using a simple finite element program and a thermal strain analogy to represent the thaw contraction of a buried permafrost layer. The pipe was treated as a
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleThaw‐Subsidence Effects on Offshore Pipelines
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume5
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Cold Regions Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)0887-381X(1991)5:1(28)
dc.treeJournal of Cold Regions Engineering:;1991:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record