Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSelimefendigil, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorOkulu, Damla
dc.contributor.authorÖztop, Hakan F.
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-23T08:34:20Z
dc.date.available2026-08-23T08:34:20Z
dc.date.copyright2026/10/01
dc.date.issued2026
dc.identifier.issn0199-6231
dc.identifier.othersol-25-1283.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4316748
dc.description.abstractAbstract. Photovoltaic (PV) panels reach high temperatures during energy conversion, resulting in performance degradation. To prevent this situation, various cooling methods are applied to PVs. In this study, a cooling channel and thermoelectric generator (TEG) were utilized in concentrated photovoltaic (CPV) cooling. Three different configurations were designed, and the effects of increasing solar concentration ratio (C = 1–6) on the energy and exergy performances were investigated. The CPV-channel, CPV-channel-TEG, and CPV-TEG-channel designs were named as Cases 1–3, respectively. Nanofluid was applied as a cooling fluid to each channel design. This study utilized aluminum oxide–water (Al2O3) nanofluid. Aluminum oxide–water was applied in the channel system at a volume fraction of 3% at Re = 1000 and an inlet temperature of 20 °C. Under the influence of these parameters, energy and exergy analyses of Cases 1–3 were carried out. Electrical power from PV was most enhanced in Case 2. On the other hand, the highest TEG electrical power was achieved in Case 3. The change of C from minimum to maximum resulted in the highest total output power value for Case 3. In Case 3 for C = 6, with 21.24% and 19.24% higher total output power compared to Cases 1 and 2, respectively. From C = 1 to 6 caused a decrease of 15.34% and 12.95% in the electrical exergy efficiency of Cases 1 and 2, respectively, while it provided a 2% improvement in Case 3. The thermal exergy efficiency, which reaches the maximum value at C = 6, is 1.18%, 1.14%, and 11.21% at C = 6 for Cases 1–3, respectively. The increase in C had different effects for Cases 1–3. Both PV and TEG were utilized most effectively in Case 3.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleComparative Assessment of Three Cooling Designs on the Energy and Exergy Performance of a Concentrated Photovoltaic Panel
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume148
dc.journal.issue5
dc.journal.titleJournal of Solar Energy Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4071840
dc.journal.fristpage340
dc.journal.lastpage358
dc.page19
dc.treeJournal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:005
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record