Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMorris, John
dc.contributor.authorMocko, Gregory
dc.contributor.authorWagner, John
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-23T08:28:28Z
dc.date.available2026-08-23T08:28:28Z
dc.date.copyright2026/07/01
dc.date.issued2026
dc.identifier.issn0022-0434
dc.identifier.otherds-25-1195.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4316599
dc.description.abstractAbstract. System modeling frameworks can be categorized into imperative and declarative paradigms. A model's paradigm effects its efficacy: imperative models allow simple execution, while declarative models capture the behavior of the underlying system. This paper compares these paradigms, as well as functional and object-oriented frameworks, in light of physics-based systems. This is done by exploring the principles of systems modeling and simulation. Simulation is shown to be the composition of functions representing system behavior. Simulatable frameworks can be differentiated by their ability to identify and compose these functions for a specific input and output pairing. The various frameworks are explored, applying concepts more typically studied in computer science to general systems engineering. The frameworks are investigated by comparing simulations of a driven double pendulum in various modeling languages. Observations include that functional, declarative models allow for greater reusability and holistic system simulation.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleEffects of Functional and Declarative Modeling Frameworks on System Simulation
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume148
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4070883
dc.journal.fristpage297
dc.journal.lastpage340
dc.page44
dc.treeJournal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record