• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    An In Situ Examination of Running Specific Prostheses Stiffness Properties

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    bio-25-1164.pdf (1.101Mb)
    Date
    2026
    Author
    Agnew, Paige M.
    Bennett, Hunter J.
    Ringleb, Stacie I.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Abstract. Since the development of running specific prostheses (RSPs) in the 1980s, individuals with lower limb loss have been able to engage in more modes of physical activity including running competitively and recreationally. Researchers have been led to investigate different mechanical properties like stiffness and hysteresis using machine testing. However, machine testing is limited by loading and deformation rates that are well below those recorded during running. The purpose of this investigation is to examine the mechanical properties of RSPs in situ. Three-dimensional motion capture and force platforms were used to record deformation and external loading while two participants ran at their 1-mile pace using their prescribed prosthetic device. Linear and nonlinear prosthetic stiffness and hysteresis were calculated for each trial across loading and restoration phases using the vector magnitudes of three-dimensional force and deformation measured via markers affixed to the prosthesis. Linear stiffness during the loading phase was relatively similar across participants (∼26 kN/m), despite differences in prosthesis type, body mass, and running speeds. However, linear stiffness was reduced by 5–10% during the restoration phase. Overall, both prostheses force–deformation relationships were nonlinear, exhibiting variable stiffness throughout each phase, a crossover point (“pinched hysteresis curve”), and smooth transitions between loading and restoration phases. Machine tested stiffness values from the literature were approximately 5 kN/m lower compared to in situ stiffness values. These findings illustrate the importance of understanding the in situ properties for RSPs, user applications, and clinical recommendations for prostheses prescription.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4316504
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV