Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLi, Chen
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Gang
dc.contributor.authorQiang, Xianjie
dc.contributor.authorZou, Jianjun
dc.contributor.authorWang, Jian
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xiaogang
dc.contributor.authorXu, Junbo
dc.contributor.authorJin, Zhongmin
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-23T08:03:12Z
dc.date.available2026-08-23T08:03:12Z
dc.date.copyright2026/02/01
dc.date.issued2026
dc.identifier.issn0148-0731
dc.identifier.otherbio-25-1033.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4316010
dc.description.abstractAbstract. In order to develop an efficient and safe direct ventricular assist device, this study analyzed the effects of compression, torsion, and compression–torsion loading modes on the ventricles. A three-dimensional (3D) dynamic biventricular finite element model of a patient with heart failure (HF) was developed, and three different loading modes of direct ventricular assist devices were simulated to evaluate their advantages by comparing the hemodynamic and biomechanical parameters. For the compression and torsion modes, the range of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased from a baseline of 36.2% to a maximum of 47.9% and 40.6%. For the compression–torsion mode, applying a 40 deg torsion angle at 2.5 kPa compression mode increased the LVEF from 40.45% to 43.6%. However, applying a 40 deg torsion angle on the 7.5 kPa compression mode, the ejection fraction decreased from 47.7% to 45.9%. Meanwhile, the maximum principal stresses in the compression mode were generally below 80 kPa, whereas the maximum principal stresses in the multiple nodes of torsion and compression–torsion were greater than 150 kPa. The compression assist mode is more effective and safer than the torsion mode. Applying torsion at lower pressure (2.5 kPa + 40 deg) further increased the output, whereas applying torsion at higher pressure (7.5 kPa + 40 deg) decreased the output of the device. These experiments provide a theoretical basis for the design and optimization of direct ventricular assist devices.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleComparison of Hemodynamic and Biomechanics of Direct Ventricular Assist Devices in Various Loading Modes: A Simulation Study
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume148
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4068928
dc.journal.fristpage3599
dc.journal.lastpage3726
dc.page128
dc.treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record