Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPan, Longye
dc.contributor.authorLi, Guangfa
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Tong
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Dehao
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yan
dc.contributor.authorLu, Yanglong
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-23T07:52:48Z
dc.date.available2026-08-23T07:52:48Z
dc.date.copyright2025/12/01
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.issn1530-9827
dc.identifier.otherjcise-25-1283.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315748
dc.description.abstractAbstract. Machine learning (ML) technique is a critical tool to promote optimal design and ensure reliable and efficient products and processes in the manufacturing industry, since it can discover hidden knowledge and build complex relationships by learning patterns from data. However, the inherent ‘black-box’ nature of ML presents a major challenge in interpreting the mechanism and outcomes of the models. Moreover, reliable ML predictions are highly dependent on the amount and quality of training data. To address these issues, physics-informed machine learning (PIML), also known as scientific machine learning, has emerged as a new research field. PIML incorporates physical and domain knowledge into ML models to guide the ML training process, which enables more interpretable and reliable models. To fully leverage the advantages of PIML and promote the advancement of design and manufacturing, it is essential for researchers to understand the available PIML methodologies and the technical challenges of PIML methods. This article provides a systematic review of the state-of-the-art in PIML, focusing on the methodologies of integrating physics into ML. The PIML techniques can be grouped into three categories, including hybrid models, physical loss-based models, and physics-embedded architectures. Each of these categories is further stratified according to different integration approaches and ML models. The methods and applications of each technique are summarized. In addition, the technical challenges and potential opportunities of PIML are critically analyzed and discussed, providing a roadmap to narrow the research gaps in PIML.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titlePhysics-Informed Machine Learning in Design and Manufacturing: Status and Challenges
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume25
dc.journal.issue12
dc.journal.titleJournal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4070100
dc.journal.fristpage1328
dc.journal.lastpage1340
dc.page13
dc.treeJournal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering:;2025:;volume( 025 ):;issue:012
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record