• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Medical Devices
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Medical Devices
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Topology Optimization of a Hip Implant for Additive Manufacturing

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    med-25-1101.pdf (1.646Mb)
    Date
    2026
    Author
    Fritz, Christian
    Bernitt, Christoph
    Zaeh, Michael Friedrich
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Abstract. Large acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision surgery pose a major challenge in achieving stable fixation and restoring physiological load transfer. In such cases, patient-specific implants are currently used to ensure secure anchoring through customized fit. These implants can be additively manufactured to ensure price competitiveness with standard implants. A major disadvantage of metallic implants is the difference in compliance compared to human bone, which leads to stress shielding, one of the main reasons for revision surgeries. To address this challenge, this work analyzes different optimization approaches for the inner design of additively manufactured implants for large-volume defects. These approaches include the use of contact force constraints, regional strain energy constraints, or manufacturing constraints. A biomechanical finite element model of the hip with a Paprosky type 3A defect was created. The optimized implants were evaluated regarding the contact forces, the regional strain energy, and the von Mises stresses across different load cases. The results showed that the implant optimized concerning contact force and manufacturing constraints provided the most native regional strain energy and low contact forces. These parameters lead to improved implant durability and a more favorable outcome for the patient, suggesting it as a promising candidate for clinical application. Additionally, initial experimental tests were conducted. Tensile tests were performed to validate the material parameters of the model, while dynamic tests were used to evaluate the initial implant design.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315584
    Collections
    • Journal of Medical Devices

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV