• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Part B: Subsurface Energy and Carbon Capture
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Part B: Subsurface Energy and Carbon Capture
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Fracture/Fault Reactivation Determination and Carbon Storage Stability Analysis of CO2 Injection in Shale Reservoirs After Fracturing

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    jertb-26-1059.pdf (1.080Mb)
    Date
    2026
    Author
    Wang, Ying
    Wu, Ke
    Cao, Jiawei
    Chen, Siwei
    Chen, Zhaowei
    Fang, Chao
    Liu, Jihan
    Zhang, Haozhen
    Tan, Peng
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Abstract. CO2 Geological storage and enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR) are key pathways for the low-carbon energy transition. In fractured shale reservoirs, however, injection-induced pore-pressure buildup and stress redistribution may reduce fault stability and threaten storage safety. To quantitatively evaluate fault stability, this study develops a three-dimensional numerical model including injection wells, hydraulic fractures, and high-angle faults, incorporating CO2 adsorption–desorption effects. Fault slip tendency (ST) is adopted as the activation criterion to characterize fault-stability evolution. Sensitivity analyses are conducted for key engineering parameters, including injection rate, cumulative injection volume, injection location, fault–well distance, and fracture half-length. Grey relational analysis is used to identify the main controlling factors. Results demonstrate a pronounced nonlinear response of fault stability to injection parameters. Under the investigated scenarios, the maximum fault slip tendency varies from 0.35 to 0.91, and a warning threshold of ST = 0.8 is used to identify potential fault activation risk. Specifically, increasing the injection rate from 3000 to 12,000 m3/d raises the maximum ST from 0.60 to 0.91, while bottom injection yields a maximum ST of 0.81, higher than top injection (0.52) and middle injection (0.35). Increasing fracture half-length from 90 to 180 m raises the maximum ST from 0.45 to 0.81. Grey relational analysis shows that the relative influence of the investigated parameters is ranked as cumulative injection volume > injection location > fracture half-length > injection rate > fault–well distance.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315516
    Collections
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Part B: Subsurface Energy and Carbon Capture

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV