• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Part B: Subsurface Energy and Carbon Capture
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Part B: Subsurface Energy and Carbon Capture
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Pressure Drawdown Management Based on Multi-Zone Pressure Decline Behavior in Shale Reservoir by Physical Experiments

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    jertb-25-1112.pdf (1.718Mb)
    Date
    2026
    Author
    Qin, Jiazheng
    Zhang, Senlin
    Bian, Xiaoqiang
    Zhang, Zhuxin
    Jiang, Songlian
    Cheng, Minmao
    Shi, Wenyang
    Tang, Yong
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Abstract. Shale gas reserves are quite abundant worldwide. However, reservoir permeability and fracture conductivity will reduce severely with the rapid pressure decrease due to the stress effect, ultimately impacting the estimated ultimate recovery. However, experimental studies on pressure drawdown management and permeability variations based on deep shale have been rarely reported. To fill this gap, the integrated and innovative experimental methods are proposed to measure the influence of different pressure drawdown strategies (aggressive, moderate, or conservative) on permeability characteristics and pressure decline behavior. In this study, reservoirs near to the wellbore are divided into three distinct zones: the propped fracture zone (PF), the unpropped fracture zone (UF), and the matrix zone (M). These zones are represented by three different core samples. First, stress sensitivity experiments of PF, UF, and M cores are established to quantify the influence of effective stress on permeability. Then, a pressure drawdown management experiment of PF–UF–M multi-zone is established to investigate the relationship between the pressure drawdown strategy and production, further analyzing the loss of permeability under different strategies. The experimental results under different pressure drawdown strategies show that under the aggressive strategy, the permeability loss of each core is the most significant. The cumulative gas production under the conservative strategy increased by 5.6% compared to that of the moderate strategy, and by 12% compared to that of the aggressive strategy. This study shows the profound influence of stress effects on shale gas reservoir production. It offers theoretical and technical insights for refining shale gas development strategies.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315434
    Collections
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Part B: Subsurface Energy and Carbon Capture

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV