• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Nonlinear Spatial Modeling and Comparison of a Compact Compliant Linear Guide for Integration With Active Ferrofluid Bearings

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    jmr-25-1403.pdf (1.049Mb)
    Date
    2026
    Author
    Kuresangsai, Pongsiri
    Cole, Matthew O. T.
    Bai, Ruiyu
    Hao, Guangbo
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Abstract. Compliant mechanism (CM) motion stages are used in high-precision applications for their frictionless, smooth motion with minimal hysteresis. However, parasitic motion errors and instability arise due to finite stiffness in constrained directions and nonlinear elastokinematic effects. This research introduces a novel approach to controlling parasitic motion and enhancing CM stiffness in constrained directions using active ferrofluid bearings (AFBs), which can precisely generate force and pressure via magnetic fields. A planar linear motion stage CM providing a single degree-of-freedom (DoF) is proposed to reduce complexity and facilitate integration with AFBs, allowing a simple and clear demonstration of the CM-AFBs’ performance. The AFBs are simply integrated beneath the motion stage to control parasitic motion and enhance stiffness in out-of-plane constrained directions. Two candidate designs are considered: the conventional and the newly proposed CM motion stage design with vertical offset. This study focuses on a preliminary investigation of the passive properties of the candidate designs: parasitic motion and directional stiffness, without incorporating AFB modeling or control. The nonlinear spatial beam constraint model (SBCM) is used to analyze parasitic motion and passive stiffness, showing good agreement with finite element analysis (FEA). The newly proposed design exhibits significantly higher out-of-plane torsion stiffness (230%). Additionally, it has a 260% higher passive in-plane torsional stiffness, which cannot be controlled by AFBs. This design has the advantage of integrating with AFBs to enhance overall system stiffness, load capacity, and stability under control implementation.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315248
    Collections
    • Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV