Fission within Fusion
| dc.contributor.author | Abrams, Michael | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-23T07:29:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-08-23T07:29:08Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026/01/01 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0025-6501 | |
| dc.identifier.other | me-2026-jan2.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315162 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract. Despite decades of effort and billions in investment, there is not yet a fusion technology that has achieved sustained commercial net energy output. The conventional approach to fusion involves doughnut-shaped magnetic containers called tokamaks, but some well-funded startups are pursuing radically different methods, fueled by the broader belief that one of these competing paths will eventually succeed. | |
| dc.publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| dc.title | Fission within Fusion | |
| dc.type | Journal Paper | |
| dc.journal.volume | 148 | |
| dc.journal.issue | 1 | |
| dc.journal.title | Mechanical Engineering | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1115/1.2026-Jan2 | |
| dc.journal.fristpage | 1 | |
| dc.journal.lastpage | 7 | |
| dc.page | 7 | |
| dc.tree | Mechanical Engineering:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:001 | |
| dc.contenttype | Fulltext |