Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStuhlmeier, Raphael
dc.contributor.authorMeisner, Eytan
dc.contributor.authorKhait, Anatoliy
dc.contributor.authorLiberzon, Dan
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-23T07:29:02Z
dc.date.available2026-08-23T07:29:02Z
dc.date.copyright2026/09/01
dc.date.issued2026
dc.identifier.issn0098-2202
dc.identifier.otherfe-26-1032.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315158
dc.description.abstractAbstract. Wave measurements from fixed gauges in a flume produce time-series of surface elevation. To characterize the waves and enable a comparison with theory, additional spatial information is needed. This is commonly obtained by simultaneous measurements at pairs of gauges with spacing much smaller than a typical wavelength, assuming the surface profile to be frozen between the gauges. Although a “wave” can be defined as the signal between successive positive or negative zero-crossings, between successive crests, or between successive troughs, experimental measurements are not agnostic to the choice of metric. We show that wave-by-wave measurements of phase velocity or wavelength are most stable and consistent over repeated experiments when using wave-by-wave cross-correlation, as opposed to the passage of zero-crossings, crests, or troughs. The high variability of these other metrics may contribute to some of the difficulty in measuring nonlinear wave properties in flume experiments.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleOn the Experimental Measurement of Wave-by-Wave Properties
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume148
dc.journal.issue9
dc.journal.titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4072026
dc.journal.fristpage216
dc.journal.lastpage234
dc.page19
dc.treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:009
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record