Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBair, Scott
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-23T07:24:19Z
dc.date.available2026-08-23T07:24:19Z
dc.date.copyright2026/08/01
dc.date.issued2026
dc.identifier.issn0742-4787
dc.identifier.othertrib-26-1100.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315056
dc.description.abstractAbstract. Ward Winer was a pioneer in the high-pressure rheology of liquid lubricants who championed the use of viscometers to understand the rheology of elastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHL). The classical approach to EHL ignores viscosity measured in high-pressure viscometers and substitutes fictional narratives regarding Barus, Roelands, and Eyring to justify the use of viscosities that cannot be measured in viscometers. To make film thickness formulas appear to be accurate, the pressure-viscosity coefficient can be easily adjusted. Lacking an accurate description of the temperature, pressure, and shear dependences of viscosity, researchers have resorted to some unusual assumptions to explain friction. Among these have been time-dependent viscosity, viscoelasticity, and wall-slip. It is well past the appropriate time to begin to base all EHL analysis on empirical fact and end the teaching of the fictional stories concerning rheology to tribology students.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleThe Barus–Roelands–Eyring Viscosity Artifice: A Catastrophe for Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume148
dc.journal.issue8
dc.journal.titleJournal of Tribology
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4071416
dc.journal.fristpage580
dc.journal.lastpage590
dc.page11
dc.treeJournal of Tribology:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:008
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record