Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBair, Scott
dc.contributor.authorHabchi, Wassim
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-23T07:23:37Z
dc.date.available2026-08-23T07:23:37Z
dc.date.copyright2026/08/01
dc.date.issued2026
dc.identifier.issn0742-4787
dc.identifier.othertrib-25-1378.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4315039
dc.description.abstractAbstract. Most published high-pressure rheological properties of elastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHL) lubricants came about from the Roelands/Eyring framework applied to measured traction. Sometimes Roelands is replaced with a similar function which also lacks the previtreous response. Using the real thermophysical properties of a well-characterized mineral oil, it is demonstrated that the Roelands/Eyring framework can reproduce a traction curve, which was generated from the experimentally validated Hybrid/Carreau framework. Two different sets of rheological models with very different piezoviscous and shear-thinning responses can generate the same traction curve within experimental error, leading to the conclusion that there is insufficient information in a traction curve to extract the rheological properties of the oil. Even worse, the fluid parameters extracted from traction curves are system dependent. It is shown here that the properties are different for line and circular contacts.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleRheology Extracted From Traction Curves: Is There Enough Information?
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume148
dc.journal.issue8
dc.journal.titleJournal of Tribology
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4069376
dc.journal.fristpage258
dc.journal.lastpage264
dc.page7
dc.treeJournal of Tribology:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:008
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record