Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDammann, Maximilian
dc.contributor.authorSchulten, Benedikt
dc.contributor.authorGoeing, Jan
dc.contributor.authorSteiner, Maximilian
dc.contributor.authorKoster, Max
dc.contributor.authorFriedrichs, Jens
dc.contributor.authorSeume, Joerg R.
dc.contributor.authorWein, Lars
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-23T07:21:25Z
dc.date.available2026-08-23T07:21:25Z
dc.date.copyright2026/08/01
dc.date.issued2026
dc.identifier.issn0742-4795
dc.identifier.othergtp-25-1621.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4314985
dc.description.abstractAbstract. Maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) of jet engines rely on geometric inspection and aerothermodynamic performance analysis of compressor and turbine blades. In order to analyze the variability of airfoil parameters due to manufacturing tolerances and deterioration effects and to investigate the impact of the geometric variability on jet engine efficiency, previous studies have developed various airfoil parameterization and reconstruction methods. However, these methods were adapted for blades and vanes of specific compressor or turbine stages, while general-purpose methods have not been developed yet for stator vanes and rotor blades. Therefore, this study compiled nominal and measurement data for several compressor and turbine stages of four different commercial turbofan engines. These data were subsequently used to develop general-purpose parameterization and reconstruction methods based on new approaches for (i) the determination of the camber line, (ii) the mathematical description of airfoil profiles at leading and trailing edges, and (iii) the reconstruction of airfoil shapes. The parameterization and reconstruction of both nominal and measurement data show that the methods are robust and reliable and provide accurate results. The methods can be utilized for the geometry analysis of non-nominal (especially deteriorated) blades and for the geometry alteration of nominal blades to investigate deterioration effects. Furthermore, the analysis demonstrates that robust methods should have fewer underlying assumptions and more complex software routines compared to tailored approaches for specific compressor or turbine stages. Such routines are, in particular, recommended for nominal blades of high-pressure turbines (HPT) and deteriorated blades.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleMaintenance of Jet Engines: Robust Parameterization and Reconstruction of Compressor and Turbine Blades
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume148
dc.journal.issue8
dc.journal.titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4070338
dc.journal.fristpage515
dc.journal.lastpage525
dc.page11
dc.treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:008
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record