| dc.contributor.author | Tantravahi, Santosh | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-17T21:54:10Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-02-17T21:54:10Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | 11/8/2024 12:00:00 AM | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1555-1415 | |
| dc.identifier.other | cnd_020_01_011005.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4310813 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper presents a comparative analysis on the space manipulator systems dynamics modeling approaches, namely, the standard approach (SA) and the dual quaternion based dynamics modeling approach. A detailed analysis supported by the results from numerical simulations, comparing the two approaches in terms of operational count and execution time, has been presented to determine which approach is computationally and temporally efficient. | |
| dc.publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| dc.title | A Comparative Analysis Among Dynamics Modeling Approaches for Space Manipulator Systems | |
| dc.type | Journal Paper | |
| dc.journal.volume | 20 | |
| dc.journal.issue | 1 | |
| dc.journal.title | Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1115/1.4066854 | |
| dc.journal.fristpage | 11005-1 | |
| dc.journal.lastpage | 11005-7 | |
| dc.page | 7 | |
| dc.tree | Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics:;2024:;volume( 020 ):;issue: 001 | |
| dc.contenttype | Fulltext | |