Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAzad, Saeed
dc.contributor.authorHerber, Daniel R.
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-17T21:49:09Z
dc.date.available2026-02-17T21:49:09Z
dc.date.copyright4/11/2025 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.issn0022-0434
dc.identifier.otherds_147_05_054502.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4310682
dc.description.abstractMotivated by current gaps in uncertain control co-design (UCCD) literature, this brief is focused on some of the implementation of these formulations, with an emphasis on optimal control structures, and uncertainty propagation techniques. Specifically, we propose three optimal control structures for UCCD problems: (i) open-loop multiple-control (OLMC), (ii) multistage control (MSC), and (iii) open-loop single-control (OLSC). Stochastic in expectation UCCD (SE-UCCD) and worst-case robust UCCD (WCR-UCCD) formulations are implemented for a simplified strain-actuated solar array case study. Solutions to the OLMC SE-UCCD problem are obtained using generalized Polynomial Chaos (gPC) expansion and Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). The OLMC and MSC WCR-UCCD problems are solved by leveraging the structure of the linear program, leading to polytopic uncertainties. Insights gained underscore the role of the control structure and UCCD formulations in managing the tradeoffs between risk and performance.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleA Case Study Comparing Both Stochastic and Worst-Case Robust Control Co-Design Under Different Control Structures
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume147
dc.journal.issue5
dc.journal.titleJournal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4068144
dc.journal.fristpage54502-1
dc.journal.lastpage54502-8
dc.page8
dc.treeJournal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control:;2025:;volume( 147 ):;issue: 005
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record