• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Applied Mechanics Reviews
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Applied Mechanics Reviews
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Reduced and All-At-Once Approaches for Model Calibration and Discovery in Computational Solid Mechanics

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    amr_077_04_040801.pdf (5.193Mb)
    Date
    2025
    Author
    Römer, Ulrich
    Hartmann, Stefan
    Tröger, Jendrik-Alexander
    Anton, David
    Wessels, Henning
    Flaschel, Moritz
    De Lorenzis, Laura
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    In the framework of solid mechanics, the task of deriving material parameters from experimental data has recently reemerged with the progress in full-field measurement capabilities and the renewed advances of machine learning. In this context, new methods such as the virtual fields method and physics-informed neural networks have been developed as alternatives to the already established least-squares and finite element-based approaches. Moreover, model discovery problems are emerging and can be addressed in a parameter estimation framework. These developments call for a new unified perspective, which is able to cover both traditional parameter estimation methods and novel approaches in which the state variables or the model structure itself are inferred as well. Adopting concepts discussed in the inverse problems community, we distinguish between all-at-once and reduced approaches. With this general framework, we are able to structure a large portion of the literature on parameter estimation in computational mechanics—and we can identify combinations that have not yet been addressed, two of which are proposed in this paper. We also discuss statistical approaches to quantify the uncertainty related to the estimated parameters, and we propose a novel two-step procedure for identification of complex material models based on both frequentist and Bayesian principles. Finally, we illustrate and compare several of the aforementioned methods with mechanical benchmarks based on synthetic and experimental data.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4310404
    Collections
    • Applied Mechanics Reviews

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV