• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Mechanistic-Empirical Design for Rubblized Pavements in Michigan

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    JPEODX.PVENG-1689.pdf (2.268Mb)
    Date
    2025
    Author
    Faizan Ahmad Lali
    Rahul Raj Singh
    Syed Waqar Haider
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Pavement mechanistic-empirical design (PMED) is a modern approach to designing new and rehabilitated pavements. The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) follows the current guideline methodology for rehabilitation designs, utilizing hot-mix asphalt (HMA) overlays on rubblized plain cement concrete (PCC) pavements as new flexible pavement. PMED offers an alternative of HMA overlay on fractured jointed plain cement concrete (JPCP) for rubblized pavements. This paper investigates the optimal design approach and HMA input level for rubblized pavements in Michigan, comparing performance predictions using global and locally calibrated models across three input levels. Results indicated negligible differences between new and overlay designs at global performance predictions for input Levels 1 and 3. Local calibration at Level 1 produced better outcomes, but Level 3 results were also acceptable, barring the thermal cracking model. The study analyzed 11 pavement sections, revealing that HMA thicknesses were, on average, 1.02 cm thinner than current guideline designs. A new flexible pavement design with Level 1 data input is recommended for rubblized pavements in Michigan. This study aims to improve HMA overlay design on rubblized pavements, promoting efficient, cost-effective pavement rehabilitation. Although several studies are available on implementing the PMED for new pavements, research on rehabilitated pavements is limited. Moreover, different design options and input levels in the PMED and data unavailability make the design of rehabilitated pavements more challenging. By comparing PMED design options (overlay and new), calibration methods, and input levels (Levels 1, 2, and 3), the study seeks to enhance prediction accuracy for key pavement distresses. These findings will aid practitioners in selecting the optimal design and input level for effective rehabilitation, especially when data availability is challenging. The study’s findings validate the MDOT current practice of treating HMA overlays over rubblized concrete as new flexible pavements.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4309942
    Collections
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV